Too much socialist agenda here.

If they had guns this wouldn't have happened...

So what happened hundreds of times before. Ice worshipping fear mongering.

if it does …. it does.... if it doesn't... it doesn't.... it will do what ever God wants it to do

Ok is the size of Manhattan a measurement cause I haven't got a clue how big it is never was taught that in school can we use sq miles or km please

and since its floating already it wont change things one iota. i used that greek word because Archimedes knew this 2400 years before Nat Geo.

It's getting separated from it's family...must be Trump's fault

Trump should build a tower on that thing and live there...

Just a little ice for the Russian vodka.

It's not just gonna fall in the ocean and create some massive wave. Its already floating. Just stuck to other floating ice still. When it breaks, it's just gonna be a massive free floating iceberg. Nothing eventful will come of it when it does.

Oh no!!! The horror! Ice breaking off of an iceberg!!

Just today alone, another 200000 humans are added onto the world, that’s a million every 5 days, dwarfing whatever measures one take to make the world liveable..... Universal education, equal gender rights and easy access to contraception for those who want it are urgent measures we need to give TOP priority to..... 🙏

Oh the sun could fall out of the sky too

It probably is affected by climate change. Over the last 35 years? Around the time man made global warming and the anthropocene were thought of?

Will the penguins be on it if it happens?

Remake of game of thrones?

Just get some duct tape

Time to evacuate the penguins I'd say. :-)

cause a happy feet dance on top of it :D

Not likely driven by? So what’s causing such a massive calving then

Make a canoe put it on your house and wait for it get on it with seat belts and floats

THAT would be sight to behold.

Big Chunkus ready to smash.

And never be heard of again.

That helps the polar bears

Linda imagem!!

ASU ATENCIÓN Pierde el sueño porque no sabe cómo obtener un préstamo. * Buscando un préstamo para pagar tus deudas. * Buscando un préstamo para iniciar su propio negocio. * Buscando préstamos para grandes proyectos. * Tienes un sueño y te das cuenta de que no es posible. Nuestra empresa en colaboración con otros socios. Suficientemente capaz de otorgarle préstamos de financiamiento e inversión para finalmente completar sus proyectos. No pierdas el tiempo, contáctanos por whatsapp +22 990 311646

Amanda Luong

Son los mejores

Samuel

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=793994887652279&id=100011253254799

Fran Stroud!

https://www.facebook.com/groups/894102480602609/permalink/2395993477080161/

Matt Dunne

My nephew lives in Hawaii

Ian Howe

nice

Allison Brown

Balkan line or NATO lessons for the Slavs On the 4th of April 1949 North Atlantic Treaty Organization ( NATO ) was founded to «protect Europe from Soviet influence». On that moment included 12 countries: USA, Canada, Iceland, Great Britain, France, Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Norway, Denmark, Italy, and Portugal. Today, this military-political bloc unites most European countries, USA and Canada. USA has a dominant position in NATO. This gives it the opportunity to manipulate the allies and use the Alliance with a greater share of personal benefits for the United States. But in order to organize and keep such union for a long time, was possible only to have a permanent external threat. Earlier USSR was a general scarecrow as a possible threat to security of the USA and NATO. Now by threat consider Russia. Creation of conditions for hostile forces of the USA in which attempts to reach a dominant position in the region were neutralized became the main line of foreign policy of the USA and by it controlled NATO. The main criteria which serve as justification for pressure or even military intervention of the United States are: • availability or possession of nuclear weapon and charge of its distribution; • communication with the enemies of USA; • the dictatorship regime in the country. Exactly these arguments are announced as a possible threat to the security and beliefs of the public. Similar can be observed for the example of Yugoslavia as one of the victims of USA and NATO aggression. In the spring 1999, NATO violated the UN Charter and initiated the start of Operation «Allied Force», during which only at the first stage 460 warplanes were used and by the end of the operation their numbers had increased more than 2.5 times. The size of the land group of the Alliance was 10 thousand people with heavy armored vehicles and tactical missiles in service. During the first month, the naval group was increased to 50 ships, which were equipped with sea-based cruise missiles and 100 deck aircraft, and then it increased more than several times. In total 927 planes and 55 ships participated in the «Allied Force» operation. NATO troops were served by powerful group of space means. Yugoslavia land forces at the beginning of the NATO aggression amounted 90 thousand people and about 16 thousand people of the police and security forces. The Yugoslavian army had about 200 warplanes, about 150 air defense system with limited fighting opportunities. During the first stage of the operation, Yugoslavia oil industry was destroyed, 40% of the tank and automotive industries, 50% of the ammunition industry, 40% of oil storages, and 100% of the strategic bridges across the Danube was destroyed. In total, during the operation, 38 000 fighting departures were made, 20,000 bombs and guided missiles were dropped, about 1000 cruise missiles of air basing were used and also 37 ,000 uranium shells. As a result of these explosions over Yugoslavia 23 tons of the depleted uranium-238 was sprayed. As a result of the bombing, about 2,000 civilians were killed, over 7,000 people were injured, 82 bridges, 48 medical facilities, 422 educational institutions were destroyed and damaged. More than 750 thousand inhabitants became refugees; 2.5 million people remained without the necessary living conditions. Material damage from the NATO aggression was more than 100 billion dollars. Of course, an important part of the operation was the information war. It included the impact to Yugoslavia information systems with the aim of destroying information sources, undermining a system of fighting management and information isolation both troops, and local population. The destruction of television and radio centers cleared the information space for «The USA Voice» station. Over time, USA and NATO more and more have become convinced that the force method is not effective to achieve global dominance. This led to a rethinking the ways of strategic confrontation and the transition to a hybrid method of warfare. This does not mean refusal of military force, it is about using more different device and methods of struggle, about complex influence of diplomatic, financial-economic and information-psychological ways. At the same time, the possibility of using military force does not only remain, but also automatically increases as a decisive argument. The hybrid war strategy is aimed at exhaustion the country and the victims. It includes a wide range of actions: at the same time to use military and irregular formations and the conduct of operations bringing disorder in the administrative, political, financial, economic, cultural and ideological spheres, and undermine military security. Recently, the struggle in cyberspace is becoming more widespread. The instruments of hybrid war are hybrid threats which unlike other types of threats, are man-made and are guided strictly by the chosen object of influence (the specific country and its vulnerabilities). It has a well-defined format, a predetermined final purpose and is the core of the strategic plan of the operation. The hybrid war against Russia has been going on for a long time. It is aimed for undermining the economic and military potential of the state, the destruction of the control system, breaking ties with allies and partners, disrupting sustainable development plans. One of the biggest last year’s examples can be Ukraine, where in 2014 USA and NATO organized a coup, and then then provoked a civil war which claimed thousands of the human lives, in south-eastern Europe sharply increased the geopolitical confrontation and became an occasion for the imposition of sanctions against the Russia. Today all external course of USA policy is directed to suppression of the states’ influence which seeks to resist of USA and NATO hegemonic. Soon, without joint adequate response to aggressive expansion of USA influence, in the world can be only one voice, which will dictate its interests to all other states. On March 18, in Belgrade at the opening the Fourth International conference "Belgrade Strategic Dialogue", which this time is devoted to the twentieth anniversary of the bombing of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, Serbian President Alexander Vucic said that bombings on March 24 - on June 10, 1999 which led to thousands of the victims among military and the civilian population, including children, and to huge material damage are NATO aggression against Serbia. All this was made without the permission of the UN Security Council. It can serve as an excellent beginning for joint cooperation of Russia and Serbia, and, perhaps, some other interested states. At a conference in Russia devoted to the twentieth anniversary of bombings of the Yugoslavia Federal Republic the report of Colonel-General Shevtsov was presented (this article is based on his report). This report described the facts of the exposure of NATO information campaigns and the consolidation of the Alliance’s confrontational course towards Russia. He also told about the unfair implementation of the USA and its allies security treaties, about the USA propensity to resolve conflicts by force and about the actions of the NATO bloc with USA in Ukraine, which make the country dependent of the Alliance. The result of the USA and NATO actions in Ukraine allows to draw analogies to Serbia, where in the same way the country was split into the people conflicting among themselves. Thus, can conclude that the USA and NATO foreign policy is destructive and aimed not only at expanding the range of influence, but also to purposeful eradication of the Slavic people as main competitor on the world scene. It’s not too late to think, do we want this? Do we need this?

Because they belong in the fucking ocean, not a swimming pool.

It's like putting a human in a 10x10 room and wondering why they don't do well.

I can’t believe this has to be explained to anyone.

Interesting, I didn’t realize that National Geographic published opinion pieces written by animal rights extremists who cite obvious false sources like “Blackfish” and PETA. Did I accidentally click on The Dodo or is the world’s leader in exploration and information turning into just another page with false and misleading information?

Because they don’t belong to us, they belong to themselves. They are not here for us, they are here for themselves. If you derive pleasure from seeing a wild animal held captive doing demeaning tricks for you, you may want to look into that. You are a sociopath. #emptythetanks

Same reasons WE don’t do well in captivity.

They don’t do well in the wild, either. There’s 75 Southern Resident Orcas That Your once-prestigious Organization That should be saving instead of going the Gabby Cowpertwaite route and giving the Middle Flipper to places like SeaWorld or the SeaQuarium in Miami. Stop hiring people who hate Zoos and Oceanariums. #Unlike

When did NatGeo become so anti-zoo, and animal rights focused? Yes, I think aquariums need to up their standards if they want to keep animals like this successfully long term. However, it’s way more complicated then that, and something the clickbait headlines and writing fail to dive into. The truth is we don’t know the median age for whales in the wild. Even the maximum ages given are controversial, and apply to only a few individuals studied. So without this valuable data, it’s ridiculous to compare it to captive animals. Not to mention how animals born or kept in aquariums today are more likely to live longer than those first kept decades ago.

Using Naomi Rose and PETA as your expert sources? This article isn’t biased at all. No thanks.

Um, yeah, no. Bunch of misleading junk in this, not the least of which, Naomi Rose is an activist (propagandist). Please leave your agenda at the door and try again with some real facts.

So we are just going to fling around falsified information as fact? Good job, Nat-Geo.

But some of ya'll still take your little heathens to sea world to watch them, don't lie. 🙄

I wish your Tank Emptying Writers read this before letting Mrs. Rose to be interviewed: https://seaworldadvocate.wordpress.com/2019/03/25/fact-checking-national-geographics-statements-on-captive-killer-whales/

No animals do well in captivity. Zoos are prisons with 100% innocent inmates.

My thoughts are that even if the life span is shorter the attention bought to the public about these mammals has given attention to their species and their survival in the wild. A small price to pay by a few very loved and well kept aquatic mammals to educated others for their survival.

It’s almost as if marine mammals didn’t evolve to live in tanks.

Humans, in their arrogance, believe they know what is best for these animals. This shows they dont. They weren't meant to swim in circles in a swimming pool full of chemicals!

Nothing does well in captivity

After I watched Black Fish and was sorry I ever went to Sea World 💀☠️💀

Orcas don’t belong in captivity. But please stop associating with PETA, they are liars and manipulators as well. They have a high kill rate at their shelters and are breed biased towards dogs.

*Why highly intelligent predatory ocean going megafauna don't do well in captivity

If everyone stopped going to Sea World they'd stop having captive orcas...

Ask yourself how happy you would be living in a cage...

It's tragic really. It's masked as "education" but in reality it's just a money venture. Poor creatures ☹️

Stress!!! Leave them in the wild where they belong